> 新闻 > 国内新闻 > 正文

脱颖而出

'Katy, Bar the Door': Why Pelosi's Trip to Taiwan is Fraught With Risk of Military Escalation_我的网站

余罪

一 |     "Remember what happened in 1983? Two days after 241 Marines were blown up in Lebanon, the USA invaded tiny Grenada. Overnight, the previous headlines disappeared. I think we are seeing the same today. NATO is losing badly in Ukraine and it’s going to be a long winter for the West. Pounding its imperial chest with Taiwan is now what the MSM is reporting, much less so Ukraine," suggests Jeff J. Brown, author of "The China Trilogy," editor at China Rising Radio Sinoland, and curator of the Bioweapon Truth Commission.,If Pelosi travels to Taiwan, this would be the first time a high-ranking US politician visits the place in 25 years. Last time it was Newt Gingrich, then-speaker of the US House of Representatives, who arrived on the island in 1997, ignoring the Chinese leadership's discontent.,"I said firmly, 'We want you to understand, we will defend Taiwan. Period,'" Gingrich told the press at the time, as quoted by The New York Times. However, Clinton administration officials made it clear that Gingrich "was speaking for himself.",Likewise, it appears that Pelosi's apparent visit to Taiwan is not in line with the Biden administration's China policy, argues Francesco Sisci, a Beijing-based China expert, author, and columnist.,"American politics is not set like an omniscient Leviathan," the China expert says. "The Congress, the Senate, the executive all move according to different agendas which do not often coincide and are in conflict with one another. The issue is that there is a growing anti-Beijing sentiment in America and this has sometimes bursts which aren’t fully sorted out. I believe the visit is an expression of a sentiment, rather than of a clear cut plan.",According to CNN, Pelosi's initiative has triggered concerns both in the Biden administration and the Pentagon, with US national security officials "quietly working to convince House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of the risks of her potential trip to Taiwan." While in 1997 Beijing and Washington managed to solve the dilemma, this time the PRC leadership might opt for a harsher response, CNN and The Guardian have warned.,US Military Expansion in Asia-Pacific is Part of Plan to Take on Russo-China Tandem, Scholar Says28 July, 16:15 GMT,Washington has been fanning US-Sino tensions for quite a while, starting with Donald Trump's tariff war against Beijing, which has yet to be halted by Joe Biden. In a candid phone conversation, Chinese President Xi Jinping warned his American counterpart against "playing with fire" over Taiwan and explained that any involvement would ultimately backfire on the US.,"A Chinese general has publicly declared that Pelosi’s visit could entail a military response from Beijing," Brown says. "China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has repeated this. Now, with Xi’s 'You get burned playing with fire' metaphor, I think there would be a military response.",Senior Colonel Tan Kefei, a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Defense, stated on July 26: "If the US insists on taking its own course, the Chinese military will never sit idly by, and it will definitely take strong actions to thwart any external force's interference.",Tan highlighted that Pelosi's visit to Taiwan would "seriously violate the one-China principle" and "seriously harm China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and seriously damage the political foundation of China-US relations.",Meanwhile, Brown surmises that China's hypothetical response "might include a declared no-fly zone." However, there is a "much more elegant option," according to the author:,"[China could] take over Taiwan’s Kinmen Island, which is only two kilometers from Xiamen, off China’s Fujian Province coast. It would take only a few hours. I do not think Beijing will strike any US targets, unless attacked first.",North Korea Ready to Mobilize Nuclear Deterrence Forces at Any Moment - Kim Jong Un28 July, 01:13 GMT,The scholar also does not rule out that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's (DPRK) remark, made earlier this week, that Pyongyang is “fully prepared” for any military conflict with the United States is no coincidence.,"Does Biden know that China and nuclear-armed North Korea have had a mutual defense treaty since 1961?" Brown asks rhetorically. "NATO is being bled dry in Ukraine and it is imperial folly, hubris or geopolitical brinkmanship to think it can fight East Asia’s biggest and most powerful military, which is only 200 km from Taiwan.",For his part, Sisci believes that the PRC could opt for an asymmetrical non-military response. Still, the unfolding crisis is complicated by the fact that Washington is already involved in a confrontation with Russia, raising questions as to whether the US is capable of taking on Moscow and Beijing at once.,"I don’t think that either China or the US wants an escalation," says Sisci. "The talk between Biden and Xi Jinping was to avoid an escalation.",Brown also believes that Beijing's warnings have been heard by Washington.,"Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan has been bandied about by Washington for months now," he says. "A supposed Covid-19 infection scuttled the first trial balloon. After Biden’s phone call yesterday with Xi, I suspect another American 'postponement' is likely to occur. If not, then 'Katy, bar the door!'"。

二 |     

在中国、俄罗斯和美国三国之间有一个很基本的看法,就是现在当今的国际外交国际政治就是由中、俄、苏三强作为主导,第二级就是包括欧盟包括其他的中东其他的阿拉伯世界还有东南亚等等这。

三 | 核心的观念还是中国、俄罗斯、美国三个国家的互动。

最近发生的这个事情一个方面是美国对中国发动新的贸易战。有人把它形容为2.0,就是拜登在过去特朗普高关税的基础下又对中国的一些新能源汽车锂电池等等一些新质生产力的产品进行加关税。
但是另外一方面俄罗斯进入了俄罗斯5.0的普京时代,普京连任以后进入5.0的时代,以后首次出访就来到了中国,大家都相信这一次中俄之间会更加紧密地合作。普京先到北京,然后到中国的东北,未来中国的东北跟俄罗斯的远东地区的合作是一个很重要的合作的方向。

四 |

问题是中国和俄罗斯的合作是没有问题的,美国要打击中国是否也是有一个新的动作,很多人觉得现在拜登的团队,拜登的政府是不是疯狂了,是不是糊涂了,怎么对中国两面手段。
一方面又说“五不四无意”,不搞冷战,不搞围堵,不搞经济的脱钩。前不久他们的财长耶伦到北京访问,他们的国务卿布林肯也到北京访问,好像也要释出一些善意要解决问题,但是回过头来,转过头来就对中国又加关税,这是毫无道理的,这个完全是违背了如今当今世界的国际公平贸易的原则,完全就是毫无道理的。说中国的产品是产能过剩,说中国的企业都受到国家的补贴,所以他们就要加关税,在这样的情况下美国对中国有传统打击。
现在其实美国是面临了两个战场。一个是俄乌战场,一个是中东战场,自己都是焦头烂额而且反而是对中国要下手。可能美国的团队他们疯狂了,他们糊涂了,我们就不理他,问题是为什么他们是要同时对中国,同时对俄罗斯进行两手的同时打击,反而把中国和俄罗斯越打越紧密这个策略其实当今世界很多的国际战略局都不明白的。因为很多人都说在三强博弈的时候一般来说都是某一方联合第三方要攻击另外一方,而事实上美国同时打击中国和俄罗斯,为什么美国这么愚蠢呢?
由于中国跟俄国之间,他们外交战略方面配合得天衣无缝,让美国很难插手在中间搞小动作。过去凡是三方的势力鼎立,一般来讲正常的做法就是美国打一把拉一把,跟俄国又暗通一些消息有来往,跟中国是又打又拉。但是问题是现在看起来不是这样子,是美国被逼到一个墙角,同时只能够被动地跟中国跟俄罗斯都要闹翻,这个是被他的霸权主义的本质所决定。
去年自从基辛格也离开的世界之后,这个世界上在美国已经很难找到美西方比较他更能够懂得在大国博弈之间能够取得平衡的那一种外交艺术的人物,所以目前在美国的共和党跟民主党都是差不多同意的这么一个立场竞争的,焦点就是说看谁对俄国看谁对中国更强硬,这个是走进的死胡同了。是不是能够有所反省呢?并不是很乐观,到最后有可能这个事件两大阵营,可能现在日本跟韩国都有一些松动,在欧洲法国是已经有一些警惕,最后美国能够拉拢的可能就是只有英国,是拼了命一定要跟美国走的,其他的都有他的积极的打算。
目前这个是比较奇怪的,但是为美国政治的体制的本质所决定的,同时也是因为今年是美国总统大选,所以里面有很多的一些情况不可以不把内部的美国国内的一些矛盾,转移视线外交到国际上去,不得已而为之,同时对俄国跟中国都挑战起来,而且越来越很难再改变这个事情,从我们这个角度来看是好事情。
第一点是,目前来说美国的政治正确,同时都是觉得要“反俄反中”。美国现在国会的政治正确,他们觉得好像任何的挑战美国霸权的人都是他们敌人,都是要同时这个进行打击,他们陷入了这样的一种非常极端的自高自大的疯狂的思维逻辑里面,所以他们不可能对俄罗斯让步,也不可能对中国让步,这是一种可能性。
另外一种就是,现在其实真正现在能够死心塌地跟这个美国走的也就是只有英国,像日本像韩国都在松动,德国和法国那就更加不要说了,所以目前的整个国际的大局是发生了一个非常不利美国的变动。

五 | 可能也正是因为美国对自己的霸权感到了这个很大的威慑的时候,他们也就没有什么策略可言了,他们只要谁反对他,他就反对谁。

在过去中国、苏联和美国的三个关键时候,美国还曾经联合中国来反对苏联的霸权,20世纪80年代的时候,基辛格在去世时候,其实也提出美国应该是联俄,既然美国把中国视为最大的挑战者,应该来说美国就跟俄罗斯应该是联合起来一起来对付中国的,但是不知道为什么过去的特朗普不听这一套,现在的拜登也不听这一套,可以看到现在拜登由于他的选举形式处于一种低潮,比特朗普要差很多,摇摆的七个州都全部是特朗普占有优势,在这样的时候拜登的团队也完全花光了手脚也不知道怎么来了既要打这个俄罗斯又要来打中国,慌慌忙忙又要对中国加税,所以在这样的情况下美国只会使得自己越走越乱,使自己走向一个死胡同。
美国国内反对以色列支持巴勒斯坦的浪潮还继续在发酵。究竟这个方面来讲会有什么影响也可能需要密切地注意,很快到暑假了看看是不是真的拜登跟特朗普再来一次对决,这个是会影响往后的判断。
目前是美国很多花招一定需要认真地看待。它有可能就是说随时变得很凶,也有可能突然就是说又后退一些,因为他是外交方面来讲,言行不一一定需要高度密切注意,需要认真对待。

六 |

我们也要看看最后普京访华有些什么实质上的成果,也相信这一次的普京的访华必然对于俄罗斯未来的经济发展一定有一个强大的助力,而俄罗斯经济发展的强大助力也必然反而去推动他们在俄乌战场上的军事的优势,所以未来在战场上俄罗斯必然会巩固他的优势。
版权声明:本文系作者原创文章,图片资料来源于网络,本文文字内容未经授权严禁非法转载,如需转载或引用必须征得作者同意并注明来源。

七 |

Current article:http://ahp7.cheshenzhuaduanza.buzz/list_lgoia/6ql.html

Published on:06:43:05